Rogerian Argument Essay Example for Free

Rogerian Argument EssayThe rime Sex With out(p) esteem by Sharon Olds is as controversial as the topic itself. The author describing the phenomenon that has mystify pervasive in in advance(p) life could non refrain from taking a stand on the issue, and this position can be either supported or refuted by the audience.When so many people are motivated by the contemporary American culture to engage in sexual intercourse without the trappings of love or even simple emotional attachment, it is interesting to re see the rime dedicated to this situation and sort out issues covered in it. Doing so will help match little t construe with to a greater extent confidence in the complex realm of human communication. Besides, it is even more interesting since Olds is the kind of poet who does not shun agitative topics and is not afraid to show her intimate life to the public. In analyzing the poem, we will try to understand whether Olds poem is a humanistic glorification of the body o r a disgusting description that satisfies bad tastes.The latter(prenominal) view of Olds poem is taken by William Logan. In his article No Mercy published in the journal New Criterion in December 1999, he and then takes no mercy on Sharon Olds calculates and their artistic value. Perhaps the only positive trait Logan finds about Olds poetry is its spontaneity and unexpectedness of the next line that in itself should be applauded in the world of literature. However, Logan is disgusted by the sensual images that unceasingly surface in the poems and repel him with their openness.Therefore, he states that reading through Olds hell-for-leather hubris you never know whats feeler next, but youre sure its going to be a disaster (Logan 199960). In short, Logan believes her work to be unblushing prose chopped up into lines of poetry, lurid as a tabloid (Logan 199960). As such, he sees Olds work as a response to the society in our dates constantly demanding from poets more descriptions of sexual lurid scenes, waste of any meaningful human emotions, and Olds is a vivid example of this trend.However, Logan takes care to dismantle the value of the poetess work on the grounds on which she seems to him to advance the radicalism in the portrayal of sexual scenes. Olds to Logan ism despite her attempts to pinch herself as a radical, a homely Redbook moralist, believing in motherhood, family, and honey on her nipples (Logan 199960). Thus, this view of Olds poetry proclaims her tasteless and lacking radicalism, tot entirelyy denigrating her work and making it look worthless.There is, however, a disparate perception of Olds poetry, and in fragmentizeicular the poem Sex Without revere. To me, in particular, this poem presents an image that is abstruse in imagery, metaphors, and perceptive comparisons. This imagery comes out in comparisons that kindredn the participants of the act in turn to dancers, ice-skaters, and children at birth.The latter, true, is a somewhat b rutal simile, but it is so to only some people who think that newborns are not particularly good-looking, while to others a newborn is as beautiful as anybody, being part of the life cycle. The first two comparisons, beautiful as dancers and gliding over each other like ice-skaters seem suitable for any taste, reinforcing the opinion that sexual intercourse, like any natural human action, is not disgusting, but beautiful and elegant (Olds).The poem also introduces an interesting perception of sexual intercourse, interpreting it in its own terms. It is unusual to someone who was brought up with the conviction that sex is pure and acceptable only when it is reassert by love and preferably by marriage. In our society, love at one point came to wait on as a convenient way to justify why people had sex outside of marriage. Therefore, with time it became almost as sacred as marriage itself. Olds takes love off its pedestal and proclaims that those who choose to bear sex without it are the true religious, the purists, the pros (Olds). Those are the people whowill notaccept a simulated Messiah, love thepriest instead of the God. They do notmistake the lover for their own pleasure (Olds).It seems that in this context sex for its own sake becomes the new norm, and love is something like a deviation from this norm. numerous people can dispute this perception, but it is certain that each person can have ones own viewpoint on these matters. In any case, the fact that Olds raises the issue and supports it with bright poetic images nonpluss this poem worth attention.The value of Sharon Olds poem is also appreciated in the Free-written Comprehension of Sex Without whap available from the Richard Stockton College of NJ website. Also noting the strong imagery of the poem, the writer also adds that the images are here not for enjoyment, but rather to exhibit the reality of the action (Richard Stockton College). Besides, the interpretation also emphasizes the fact that, l ike in many pieces of poetry, Olds does not draw the ready-made conclusion that she wants the reader to follow. In fact, she allows several explanations and has the reader make the guessing on his or her own.So is Sharon Olds a lurid author who enjoys portraying sexual scenes with all the possible details or a philosopher who introduces a new opinion, supported with adequate imagery? It feels that the resolvent can lie somewhere in between. Returning to the denigrating opinion stated by William Logan in his article, one can see that this argument covers the whole poetry. Sex Without Love, compared to other poems by Olds, is comparatively more Puritan in its imagery and does not use many shocking details.The emphasis is on the process as a whole, and the author uses broad metaphorical images like ice-skaters or runners to convey broader similarities. Abstaining from talk of the town about details like her labia or other body parts that she mentions in other poems, Olds appears more appealing to a broad audience of people with different backgrounds and views, many of whom may be anomic by more naturalistic images.By the way, talking about the imagery in Olds poetry, Logan admits that Aristotle would have love her metaphors, her anatomy lessons (Logan 199960). In Sex Without Love, Olds is at her best with building her imagery that serves to convey her message. Her images become a powerful tool for showing the event from new and new angles, creating the effect of unexpectedness mention by Logan.Most interestingly, there is a viewpoint supported by Free-written Comprehension of Sex Without Love and differing from my initial perceptions that in the poem, Olds does not at all support the idea of meaningless, thoughtless sex without emotions, and that in fact she is disgusted by it as much as her more conservative audience. The latter view is grounded in the final part of the poem where Olds compares her lovers to runnersthey are like great runners they know they are allwith the road surface, the cold, the wind,the fit of their shoes, their over-all cardio-vascular healthjust factors, like the partnerin the bed, and not the truth, which is thesingle body alone in the universeagainst its own best time. (Olds)It can be claimed that stating that the people in bed in concert are just meager factors of life strongly indicates that there is distaste for sex without love (Richard Stockton College). public speaking of cardio-vascular health as one of the factors, Olds expresses her sadness over such act of love that does not admit any emotional attachment between the two. Even though on the surface, she claims that she admires sex without love, in fact she is repelled by it, as shown in her images.After deliberation, I agree that Olds poem should perhaps be read in a different sense disputing the value and attraction of sex without emotion. Using this time less naturalistic images, Olds displays her strengths with metaphors by creating an unfor gettable picture of the two runners rushing along a meaningless travel guidebook of factors. In this poem, she may not be savoring the details of lurid sexual pictures. Instead, Olds puts in her poem a deep spiritual meaning that reiterates the old human value of love, attachment, and care. In this sense, she may indeed by lacking radicalism, but instead of this she professes values close to many in her audience.Works CitedLogan, William. No Mercy. New Criterion 18.4 (December 1999) 60.Olds, Sharon. Sex Without Love. 24 June 2002. 17 April 2006 http//plagiarist.com/poetry/4922.Richard Stockton College of New Jersey. Free-written Comprehension of Sex Without Love. 17 April 2006 http///thebalance/stories/storyReader$9.