Literary Semiotics

literary semiology Quite often the terms semiotics and semiology argon equal, so that often instead semiotics use semiology and vice versa. Ferdinand de Saussure speaks of the mansion and the first makes the tone amongst semiotics and semiology. Semiotics is the general possibility of abbreviates. Semiology study the functioning of the markal in the social practice. forthwith avoids this distinction and semiotics equate with semiology, ie, they be synonyms. GENERAL Semiotics The sign does non cost lonesome(prenominal) in language and literature, and in the burgeon forth we have and tone as a sign, signs of the folk tradition (clouds as signs, etc.. . The sign is a general phenomenon that exists in all forms of human converse. With the help of the sign announce whatsoeverthing. The sign chat across borders ????????????? communion. It is believed that she sign communication has with animals, plants etc.. Within the general linguistic information and communication th ere is the literary form of communication among generator and referee, between the operation and the ratifier etc.. Semiotics is sh ard original Semantics which focuses on the traffichip between sign and signified Second Pragmatics is a discipline that focuses on the relationship between the sign and the reader troika Syntax, syntax is a discipline that focuses on the relationship between signs, eg. text editions as signs books as characters. Semiotics makes some(prenominal) typologies and distinguishes several types of sign administrations First PRIRODOJAZICHNI SYSTEMS define them as first-and accept natural languages, ie national languages ?? (English, French, etc. ).. These be the languages ?? that ar characterized by a item practice use.In these musical arrangements each character is in relation to an target argona (reference) from the reality. not all characters are specified, does not al ports mean only objects that exist, which are in reality, solely ther e are also abstract, metaphysical signs that insinuate something that is not tangible, but still exists in our consciousness. Second Artificial sign schemes Artificial signs we have in mathematics, science and so on. These signs are called maneuveristic creationificial, because they agreed. These include road signs, sign language of the deaf, blind etc.. => Structure is a way of organizing systems.System and grammatical construction are inseparable. Third Secondary, thirdhand sign systems usually material body on existing linguistic systems and does not ever so refer to things that exist in nature. Literature uses natural language to translate literary, coding, etc. whole secondary languages ?? have pre-need of natural language and together constitute some already performed sign systems, such as. Literature. Secondary sign system eg. invention iconic, pictorial system. 4th Mixed HIBRIDIZIRANI SIGNS eg. Essay which combines prirodojazichen system and a secondary sign system and pictorial system. th METAJAZICI Metajazichni systems, metalanguage thoughts when one language describes another(prenominal) kind of language that is already built, eg. Theory of literature has described the literary language. There are meta-meta languages, such as literary criticism, literary methodological analysis etc.. Semiotics lordly linguistic and nejazichni signs, verbal and non-verbal. Semiotics distinguishes several types of signs First -Symbols symbols are all jurisprudenced signs and they denotativni. These signs have a high stagecoach of codification and konvencionalnost. In these signs the relationship between the sign and the signified is kodiviciran.Second Sign- watch in these signs the relationship between sign and signified is vividly. Iconic signs konotivni signs. The ride has features of dodgeistic creation. Third Sign-INDEX among them the relationship between sign and signified is causal. These signs are generally semiotic. physical exertion Where there is smoke there is fire. Among them there is a logical familiarity that occurs as a result of long-term perception. Eg. before an earthquake occurs, animals are disturbed, I felt mean. Also, prior to such disasters, we get information, warnings from other planets. in all this belongs to indeksnoto information.Semiotics differs constant and variable signs. The sign indicates the object replaces the issue. Therefore, the sign is viewed by the subject marks. To sign appears must(prenominal) e apostoi need an item to be replaced, to intimate. roman type Jakobson describes knizhenosta literary self-referential aesthetic message. Piece of literature at the same snip can be referential (aesthetic) and referential. Znakovnosta literature does not exhaust WMO amour signified. The sign is a tangled composition (signifier + signified). With signs serving entities, transferring to other entities, which actor that there must be an agreement.In literature, there is a high t ake of esthetics, but this does not exclude pragmatism. While eg. in journalism, a higher compass point of pragmatism, but it does not necessarily mean that there is no aesthetic. There is inter textual matteruality. For example, the parody there parodiziranje literary clobber that already exists, we mythema, whose introductory text comes from another, previously written text hipotekst. Even in the literature have metajazichnost yet dominate vtorostepenosta. It should be noted and the consideration that relates to the as yett that there is a difference between literary and linguistic systems.Some systems swift change, others to a greater extent slow. Systems include konvencionalizirani relations imply a certain application legality. Speech is practice the kind of language use. Linguistic system is slowly changing. A change in the system of language comes when occurring changes in the stuffy system. The change in the lexicon is not a real change in the language, but the cha nge in syntax is a real change, because the syntax is a mirror of the language, it is the soul, the load of language. In the 20th century resulting speedy and radical changes in literary systems, and in language systems can not change for centuries.literary system as a secondary Literary Semiotics Systems vary in grade modelativnata power. Systems have a high degree of first instance modelativna power and appeal have lower degree modelativna power. Literature is not that important (secondary) sign system. In the literature, the language system is reorganized in a different way, because prirodojazichniot system is already encoded, he once again coded in the literature, which core that the literary system is twice coded. = CODE = Code means is prohibited and what is not. The term code is not a purely literary term, but comes from egzaknite sciences (mathematics, computer science).Code shows us the best boundary between the forbidden and permitted. Modelativnata power is the abili ty to present a subject in the form of linguistic or literary figure. The model is a picture of the items indicating displays a single character. Model of the object is displayed in a text can be closer to the world that displays, but can be distant. Therefore, some characters are considered to be relatively more than(prenominal) realistic poreferencijalni, open to predmetmetot and others are considered less referential, hermetic and more restrict to the subject.Structure prirodojazichniot sign implies a direct connection between the sign and the referent. A literary system that relationship between the sign and the object is indirect, and even invisible. When reading the signs, the whole array of interpretenti that are sorted from other sign with any reader pbuduva whole range of different images, each reader think differently. For example, the term Company each poimuva different one has a no house, stone house, ruined house, a beautiful house, a house-snail, minuscular house, white house etc.. Models, the image of the subject in the literature represents what must exist, what can be absent.Ordinary language signs poreferencijalni, because the connection between the sign and the outcome may be provieri, and in literature it has not. Some literary characters only reject referentiality and identify as nereferencijalni or auto-referential. They completely distracted by the relationship between the sign and object, life, the world, etc.. But after Mallarme annulling all those links, they are invisible, and even signs can not signify anything other than themselves. These marks signify themselves and thus resolve the question of the definition of the sign that always means something that exists outside of them.These characters have their origin and their long-lasting tradition. Repealed logical connections between them, or at least invisible at first glance. There are literary characters to a greater extent referential and such that auto-referential, that su percharge thinking the sign, except the exact information they want to offer something more to the subject, ie the world who represent those signs tend to have a broader, more universal information how organized life and the world. In the literary system is aroused principle sozvuchnost musicality, that activates the eneral signification semiotichnost, which plays a major role in the formation of literary texts that it does not matter what you say, but how you say. There are 2 completely identical words. Ordinary linguistic signs are distinguished by a high degree of symmetry between the object and the sign by which that object is marked. These signs are harder legible because they distort the image of a world that is marked with this sign while doing so because of the instability between the sign and the object, ie the world not think of anything ad hocally. Literary system is First secondary, secondarySecond double coded Third iconic, picturesque, with a high degree modelativn ost 4th relationship between the object and the sign is asymmetric 5th shows interest in the character and high degree of auto-and at the same time and communication and information. It is believed that all these properties of the literary system, its social structure shows in a nutshell the tropics. It is believed that quotidian language tends to conventionalize be utilise automatically, but literary-art information tends to be something more than mere information. In this sense, ordinary getions have low informativnost.The purpose of literature is constantly questioned images umrtvile forgotten language, and it achieves when they express pull up stakes deliver another new context and text and no more primates using automated. Whats old, already seen, automated, predictable, does not carry much information. But when you make a transformation, modification context, the degree of unpredictability gives it pass on that there is some degree of aesthetic expression. What is ste reotypically can perform literary function only when you are questioned and it will say something new, unknown, unpredictable.In literary communication is very important reader that fits into his monetary standard expectation is already known, conventional, and what exceeds this measure is shocking and purely literary. To develop the system, it should be constantly introduce changes that will have a radical character. It is believed that the literary system is a complex system, because it is simultaneously modelativen iconic communicative, informative etc.. STRUCTURE AND LITERARY-artistic structure The term structure is taken from disciplines that have the exact character. This term means the constitution, construction, structure, composition.Can speak of a connection between the structure and the system (composition pragma). Pragma-linguistic semantic __ decorative what is encountered in all literary genres. Literary form is prezentativen. There is a disfavor that oako speaks of structure, must be taken only strucuturalist method. Strucuturalist method of studying literature immanent within, regardless of external factors. Structure nestatichna. This term has its pre write up and predstrukturalistichkiot method. Promotes the offshoot of Saussure, then in Prague structuralists in 30 years (Roman Jakobson).The structure is a way of organizing a race, when you are thinking of something dynamic, live outdoors. But it always is a minimum order, which can be viewed transhistoric outside of literature. It shows anthropology and linguistics. Distinguished two levels of understanding society. Archetypal structures which manifests Oedipus, infanticide, Phaedra, and it asa eglavno negative occurrence. They are constantly renewing, changing WMO their name, the essence is the same. When speaking of the structure, not thinking assemblies, but the relationship between these split that are different relations.The structure is latent given, you need to be activated to express a given relationship. It is not a material category, but a correlation between at least two split, as part of one great whole. There must be a ratio of that unit which is higher than those who own parts. The label may not mean anything. Even the sign is a higher instance. It establishes relations between the sign and the signified. The context shows us how the text structures and includes the subject, as well as the channel through which they passed.The structure is separable elements that make up the parts that build a third instance. It is not equal to the sum of those parts. The image of ?? structure has its own continuum from Plato onwards. When speaking of a literary work of art can not change the way the author laid the parts. bailiwick itself has a rigid structure, there is coherence. Any literary work of art has a minimum structure, within a text is completed. Structure does not exhaust in terms of the text itself, but continues in the relations between texts that are external.The internal structure is latent, but in proportion with the reader that changes its character. Structure becomes external, opens to a text read in a social context of a given epoch. It opens towards the category of value, ie toward non-literary categories combat-ready in the reader and the author. The text-reader-author is different in the written and oral tradition. In oral literature there is a collective, multidisciplinary artist, oral text is intend for a different kind of reception kolektiviet (holidays protakularni religious rites). The novel is an unmarried kind.It introduces a new relation to the adoption of the text (information and understanding). In workaday communication relationships are different speakers-reader known. In the literary work of art speaks of aesthetic structure art. That does not mean that it is polisemantichka multifunctional (educational, ethnic, linguistic, fun, social). Linguistic literary system implies certain conventions. The l iterary structure is composed of text and context (genre code metajazichnosta all types of channels, psychological, biographical, biological factors).Literary structure implies something conditionally given (text). Contextual factors open. The text is the primary datum in the literature. He builds with just reading and valued. Ultimately, it ends in a new value. Text Literary and artistic text Textus Lat. textus = texture, fabric, specific kind of tissue taken from the material environment and ported in the literature. Text a literary work of art and represents graphic zvukoven part of the work. It is enduring part, material, literary and artistic work that is more complex, consisting of immaterial part style.Literary-may be in oral and written (literary) form. Text changes its status through history is part of the moral language conventions. The text is also linked to the ontogenesis of human civilization. Associated with civilization signs. Each text is articulated and systemat ized, it is to communicate with him. The author (individual or collective) and the sign, by linking the text for a long time, and the reader was switched off. Today is considered that the reader can influence those literary conventions. Differences between the literary work of art and literary and artistic text.The text is considered an open category, sign, while the work is closed category, the whole classic with reduced significance. It is a theory of Roland Barthes and structuralists in France. Variability of the text seen in the oral tradition. Textuality is as fixed as a material part of the work. Each text serves not only to inform, but also to communicate. Text as a cultural and artistic means authorship readers act vrednvuanje denial and others. Cultural and artistic text linking at least two dimensions historical and artistic ontological. There are literary and non-literary texts.