Comment on the three typesetters cases of sociological theories, explain and argue, base on your depository library or Internet research, which type of system is the most appropriate surmisal for sociology to adopt. The three global types of sociological theory are positively charged, interpretive and critical theory. In determining which theory is the most appropriate for sociology to adopt, a prefatorial understanding of each theorys strengths and weaknesses is necessary. In defining each of these theories, it is important to square up the ontological hindquarters or the theorys basis for determining what is cognoscible; the epistemological basis or the theorys relationship between the knower and the knowable; and, finally, the methodological basis or the theorys method for gathering data and obtaining knowledge. A. POSITIVISTIC 1. Ontology. The incontrovertible theory is based on an ontology of being a realist. The hard-no sed slant of incontrovertibleness is also known as determinism. The confident(p) knows that a realism is protrude there to be define and categorized. The hard sciences from the time of Newton and Decartes have traditionally relied on the positivistic nestle. The positivist hopes to be able to approximate theatre in a detailed generalization or theory on how reality operates. The theories of a positivist generally comprise the form of cause and effect laws describing the away reality. Robert Merton defined these theorems as clear verifiable statements of the relationships between specified variables. 2. Epistemology. Positivism relies on an objective epistemology. The perceiver remains distant and does not move with the observation or experiment. Values and some(prenominal) other factors that might star topology to bias are to be carefully removed so that the cold, monological gaze of science fag end be use to analyze the data. The positivist is an objectivist! . 3. Methodology. The methodology of positivism is experimental and manipulative. The cuddle is the same as propounded... Great! This is what im actually talking close considering the content and the worldly presented! The way it is presented here is not frequently satisfactory that that might be because of another reason. (no relevance to the essay) I rattling liked the way you answered the question step by step. The golf links were pretty strong from paragraph to paragraph. I did not respect any run on sentences which is not bad(predicate)! You dont lack to be as well as verbose and instead lacking originality! The more short the better, but not going too extreme! If you want to get a full essay, club it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment