Science And Faith (or Something Along Those Lines)

Comp ar and Contrast : Science and doctrineBoth science and conviction are motivated by the quest to find positive justice , so both the scientist and the devout are characterized by government agency of get it onledge . The difference lies in the fact that the scientist is prone to high-handedness , believing that he has final proof of what he avows to . On the former(a) go along , the devout , when complimentary of teaching , is sensible that that belief is involved , and that it is not possible for earth to `know . The devout is therefore modest , as foreign to the scientist br who is arrogant . This is however only a blueprint of snap . The scientist may be modest if he is sensible that whole knowledge is mere belief . On the another(prenominal) hand the devout may be arrogant if his assurance takes the sti mulate of dogmaAbsolute accuracy is the goal of both science and faith . The scientific method is designed as to eliminate either errors is poster , so that knowledge derived from the observed object end be claimed as certain The scientist relies on precision of measure and numeral s towards his goal of exactitude . Faith in like manner seeks absolute knowledge , for it is knowledge of the Supreme Being which is want through religion . Such knowledge is without error , and so equivalent to what the scientist seeksBoth science and faith use doctrine of analogy to submit what they look at to say Science uses numeric models to show up its findings , and a mathematical model is in truth an analogy . A sector is a mathematical model , so when science describes something as spherical it is using analogy . This is the shadowy case . In intacty developed scientific theories more(prenominal) elaborate models are used . For example Rutherford describes the atom as a playt hing solar system , where the electrons orbi! t well-nigh the nucleus of protons and neutrons . Faith uses analogy in a more direct and unequivocal way .

For example Christians describe perfection as the grow , and this is employing explicit analogyThe scientist , however , is not forever aware that he is employing analogy , and therefore mistakes his assertions for absolute truths . rase though he acknowledges experimental error , he turn overs that it is existence overcome by the gradual progress of science , so that the errors in scientific pronouncements are becoming more and more insignificant by the day . If not the final truth , the scientist believes that he is draw close it , so that he becomes unaware of the fact that analogy is organism employed . On the other hand faith , when it is free of dogma , is quite intended of the fact that analogy is creation used . It is aware because it knows the ship canal of God will always remain a unlikable book to man , so that it is not possible to claim absolute pronouncements on God , to some(prenominal) degree of precisionThe scientist is prone to believe that there is no mystery to existence and that native ignorance is all that holds back the human being from apprehending the universe with complete demonstration . He tends to believe that modern...If you emergency to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper